kai.

A luxurious home search – Intuitive design for discovering upscale living

KAI (meaning “Ocean” in Japanese) is a newly established upscale residential company based in Chicago. It focuses on providing a luxury rental experience, combined with the comfort of modern living. KAI aims to build strong trust with residents, believing that a premium residential experience begins from the moment visitors enter the KAI website.

The objective of this project was to create a responsive website that enhances the business value and improves user experience. KAI requested a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) with the final deliverable being a high-fidelity prototype.

Project Overview
The objective of this project was to design a responsive website that enhances both business value and the user experience. KAI requested a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) as well as a high-fidelity prototype for final delivery.

Project Objective
• Design a responsive website constrained to its MVP requirements.
• Develop a luxury brand identity for KAI.
• Create a website that provides key residential information for prospective residents.
• Design product listing and product detail pages.
• Develop the company’s brand logo.

 

ROLE
UX/UI Designer
Brand Designer
Web Designer

DURATION
4 Weeks
80HRS

TOOLS
Figma
Miro
Photoshop
Illustrator

 
 

Process

 
 
 
 
 

Research

To begin, I focused on understanding how users select residential complexes within their budget, as well as their experience with current apartment websites. I explored what “luxury” and “trustworthy” meant to users, what factors are most important when choosing a residence, and how websites can improve the overall apartment-search experience.

 

RESEARCH GOALS

• Understand the impact of residential complex websites on users.
• Identify target users and current competitors in the market.
• Explore how a website can benefit both users and the company.
• Investigate what luxury and trust mean to users.
• Understand user behavior, including habits, needs, and motivations.

RESEARCH METHOD

• Market Research
• Competitive Analysis
• Provisional Personas
• User Interviews

 
 

Market Research

Market research revealed key insights into why apartment living is on the rise. According to Freddie Mac’s 2019 housing survey, 40% of renters expect never to own a home, and 80% believe renting better fits their lifestyle. Reasons include flexibility, convenience, and services like digital concierge options.

 

CURRENT MARKET TRENDS
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought permanent changes to apartment living. Property managers are innovating to create resident-focused experiences, leveraging virtual leasing, contactless services, and work-from-home amenities.

TARGET AUDIENCE
Millennials and baby boomers are two of the fastest-growing groups of renters, both looking for mobility, convenience, and a sense of community.

 
 
 

Competitive Analysis

I conducted a competitive analysis to explore how other residential companies use their websites to benefit users and their business, identifying what works and what could be improved.

 
 

Provisional Personas

Provisional personas were developed to broadly identify potential users before crafting detailed user personas.

Provisional Personas.png
 
 

User Interviews

I conducted user interviews to collect qualitative data on how people choose apartments, their values, and their pain points. Participants included individuals aged 20-40 who had recently rented or searched for apartments online.

 

KEY FINDINGS:

  • Luxury is often associated with superior amenities.

  • Users prefer floor plans with map views and high-quality photos.

  • Most users explore apartment websites before scheduling a tour.

  • Location is the top priority for many users.

  • Clear, transparent information on availability, pricing, and floor plans is crucial.

 
 

Affinity Map - User Interview

Following the interviews, I used an affinity map to analyze findings and identify important factors in apartment selection. This process revealed both necessary and unnecessary features for apartment websites.

Affinity Map - Interview 1.png
 
 

User Interview Summary

USER NEEDS:
• Clean, user-friendly UI design.
• Easy navigation.
• Trustworthy companies.
• High-quality photos.
• Reliable reviews.
• Pet- and child-friendly residences.

USER GOALS:
• Explore floor plans with a map view.
• Access virtual or video tours.
• See unit availability with detailed descriptions.
• Easily locate information on floor plans, amenities, location, and price.

USER MOTIVATIONS:
• Amenities.
• Convenience.
• Safe and clean communities.
• Good customer service.
• Ideal location for schools, work, and shopping.
• Price alerts.

USER FRUSTRATIONS:
• Hidden fees.
• False reviews or photos.
• Inaccessible pricing, floor plans, or virtual tours.
• Excessive pop-ups.
• Unsafe communities.
• Time-consuming processes.

 

Research Findings

 

• Luxury is often associated with superior amenities.
• Users prefer floor plans with map views and high-quality photos.
• Most users explore apartment websites before scheduling a tour.
• Location is the top priority for many users.
• Clear, transparent information on availability, pricing, and floor plans is crucial.
• All participants emphasized the importance of amenities.
• All preferred floor plans with a map view.
• Four out of five participants checked websites before scheduling tours.
• Most checked photos and availability first when browsing.

 
 
 

Personas

Based on research, I developed two personas: Lisa, who values community amenities, and Evan, who prioritizes in-unit amenities and location.

 
 

Emotional Journey Map

I created emotional journey maps for Lisa and Evan to visualize their feelings throughout the apartment search process, which helped me better empathize with their needs.

Emotional Journey.png
 
 

Point of View (POV)/ How Might We (HMW)

POV and HMW statements for Lisa and Evan helped me to reframe the design challenge in a way that incorporates all the information and insight I have uncovered so far. POV statement allowed me to reframes the problem in a way that is simple to understand and insight. HMW statement allowed me to think clearly and concisely as to what the real problem is and how I might solve that problem for Lisa and Evan.

HMW.png
 

Feature Roadmap

The feature roadmap was developed to outline key website elements based on insights gathered from research and competitive analysis.

15 1.png
 
 
 

Site Map

After the define stage, I’ve created a sitemap for KAI. A sitemap can help users understand how the information is structured on the site. I created a structure of sitemap after collecting the data from user research and other residential complex competitor's websites.

Sitemap.png
 
 

Task Flow

To complete the main task (Schedule a Tour), a task flow path allowed us to create the key set of steps that a user takes to find a product’s real value. This path focused on the ideal default and did not focus on exceptions or errors.

 

Crazy 8

Once I identified the key pages that I would be designing for, I began sketching the pages of the website by using the crazy 8’s method. Crazy 8’s is a core Design Sprint method. It is a fast sketching exercise that challenges people to sketch eight distinct ideas in eight minutes. The goal is to push beyond my first idea, frequently the least innovative, and to generate a wide variety of solutions.

Sketch.png
 

Low-Fi Wireframe

After sketching the pages of the website, I have translated the sketches into low-fidelity wireframes. I have designed the homepage, category page, subcategory page, and product detail page.

 
 

Low-Fi Responsive Wireframe

Low-fidelity responsive wireframes were created to adapt the design to mobile devices.

 
 
 

Usability Testing

I conducted usability testing to observe how easily users navigated the website and completed tasks like scheduling a tour. The tests revealed valuable feedback, such as the importance of adding a "Schedule a Tour" button at the top of the page and integrating a map view with floor plans.

Test Objectives

  • Evaluate ease of navigation and task completion.

  • Assess the overall design flow.

  • Measure task completion time.

  • Validate whether the design addresses user needs.

Task

  • Task 1: Check out “PLAN D” and check other features that are important for you to make the final decision of scheduling a tour. After checking all the features you need, schedule a tour.

  • Task 2: Check out community amenities and the “PLAN D” virtual tour. After checking all the features you need, schedule a tour.

Test Methodology

  • In-Person: The participants will be completing the given task on their phones using Figma Mirror

  • Remote (Zoom): The participants will be completing the given task on their computer while sharing their screen on Zoom


Participants

  • Age Demographic: 20 - 40 Years of Age

  • Participants who rented or searched apartments on the website before making the final decisions

 
 

Key Takeaways

 
  • All participants finished the task successfully.

  • All participants mentioned that Map View was the most valuable feature of
    the website.

  • All participants stated that the website was easy to navigate and follow

  • All participants were satisfied with their scheduling a tour experience.

  • All participants wished to see “Schedule a Tour” on top of the website

  • 3 out of 5 participants used List View to check availability.

  • 4 out of 5 participants suggested connecting the floor plan with a map view.

  • 3 out of 5 participants preferred to have an option to select available tour time on “Schedule a Tour”.

  • 3 out of 5 participants preferred to have a filter/sort option on the “Floor Plan” view

  • 2 out of 5 participants suggested having Safety Regulations in the Amenities.

  • 2 out of 5 participants mentioned that they would like to see Square Fit on the list view. 

  • 1 out of 5 participants suggested seeing Current availability on the “list view”.

  • 1 out of 5 participants suggested seeing Security Information on the website.

  • 3 out of 5 participants were confused with the difference between Apartments vs penthouses.

 

Affinity Map - Usability Test

After the usability testing, I created an affinity map to sort what worked, needs to be changed, questions from participants, and new ideas. The affinity map helped me to prioritize and rank the user testing feedback.

Affinity Map - testing 1.png
 
 

Priority Revision

Based on the user testing results, the highest priority revision was made including adding “Schedule a tour”, filter options, and “Map” view.

 
 

UI Kit

After the priority revision, the UI Kit was created for faster shipping. UI kits are handy tools that allow designers to quickly and efficiently create mockups for handoff. It acts as a predecessor to a design system, which involves both designers and developers, creating an ecosystem that allows for faster shipping.

UI Kit.png
 
 

Hi-Fi Wireframe

After priority revision, I designed high-fidelity wireframe of the website.

Hi-Fi Wireframe.png
 
 

Hi-Fi Responsive Wireframe

Hi-Fi Responsive Wireframe.png
 
 
 
 

High Fidelity Prototype

 
 
 

Next Step

  • Enhance prototype functionality.

  • Conduct further usability testing with high-fidelity prototypes.

  • Implement additional refinements based on user feedback.